Increase alcohol tax
This bill increases the tax on malt beverages (2.4 cents a 12 ounce bottle) to fund alcohol and drug treatment and prevention programs.
How low is the Wisconsin beer tax?
- The Wisconsin beer tax was created in 1933 (at $1 a barrel).
- It has only been raised once to $2.00 a barrel in 1969 (38 years later)
- If increased to inflation from 1933, it would be $16.12 a barrel
- If increased by inflation from 1969, it would be $10.85 a barrel
- The Berceau proposal is $10 a barrel
- It has been 38 years since the last increase!
- Wisconsin’s beer tax has lost 83% of its value due to inflation since 1969
- Wisconsin has the third lowest beer tax in the nation (6.5¢ per gallon)(3.6¢ a six-pack) (0.6¢ a 12-ounce bottle)
- Second lowest: Missouri (6¢ per gallon) (headquarters of Anheuser-Busch)
- Lowest: Wyoming (1.9¢ per gallon)
- Our neighboring states charge two to three times more
- Illinois: 19¢ per gallon
- Minnesota: 15¢
- Indiana: 12¢
- Michigan: 20¢
Is the Wisconsin beer tax a hardship for beer producers?
- The great majority of Wisconsin beer producers pay very little in state beer tax
- 79% of all beer producers in Wisconsin pay between $0 and $5,000 annually in state beer tax
- 64% of Wisconsin beer producers pay less than $1,000 annually in state beer tax
- Only 4 out of 66 beer producers in Wisconsin pay more than $100,000 in annual state beer taxes. (Miller alone pays over a $1 million)
- Over 92% of all beer producers in Wisconsin pay only half ($1.00 a barrel) of the Wisconsin beer tax (because they produce less than 50,000 barrels a year)
- Only Miller is taxed entirely at the full $2.00 a barrel tax
- Leinenkugel, Pabst, New Glarus and Mike’s Lemonade are taxes at a combination of the 50% and 100% rate
- Only 31% of all beer produced in Wisconsin is taxed at all!
- 69% is exported Wisconsin tax free (5.9 million barrels exported of 8.5 million barrels produced)
- Miller, alone, generated 77% of all of our beer tax revenue from in-state producers
- The top four, Leinenkugel, Miller, Pabst and Mike’s Lemonade account for 95% of all of our revenue from in-state producers
What is the Berceau proposal?
- The Berceau proposal is to raise the state beer tax from $2.00 a barrel to $10 a barrel
- If the beer tax was increased by inflation from 1969, it would be $10.85 a barrel
- In easy to understand terms, the Berceau proposal would add only 2.4¢ to each bottle of beer
- Or, from the current 0.6¢ a 12-ounce bottle, to 3¢ a bottle
- It would raise the state tax from the current, 3.6¢ a six-pack to 18¢ a six pack
- The current state beer tax raised $9.7 million in FY2005-06
- The Berceau proposal would raise our revenue to approximately $50 million
Will a Wisconsin beer tax increase be hardship for drinkers?
- The average drinker will not even feel the effect of an increase
- Beer producers are not concerned about the “average” drinker
- They know that most of their revenue comes from price-insensitive heavy drinkers
- 10% of all drinkers consumer 43% of all beer
- 20% of all drinker consumer 85% of all beer
- Even for a heavy drinker who consumes a six pack a day, the Berceau increase would only cost you an additional $1 a week
- Heavy and addicted drinkers who account for most of the beer consumption in the U.S. rightly pay the most in beer taxes, since their drinking imposes the greatest cost on society
- If a 3¢ per bottle tax causes you a financial burden, you have greater problems to worry about than the beer tax
- The moderate-drinking majority of drinkers consume relatively little alcohol and pay a negligible amount of alcohol taxes
- Alcoholic beverages are cheaper (25% less after adjusting for inflation) today than they were in the 1960s and 1970s. (Institute of Medicine, National Research Council)
How bad is Wisconsin’s drinking problem
- The alcohol industry is financially dependent upon underage and pathological drinking
- Nationwide, 37.6% of alcohol (by cost) was misused or illegally consumed ($48.3 billion)
- Another study put it as high as 48.8%
- Wisconsin ranks 4th highest per capita for alcohol consumption from beer (Nevada, New Hampshire and Montana rank higher)
- Wisconsin is listed among the “Fatal Fifteen” states for the highest underage drinking deaths by the National Safety Board
- Over 60,000 Wisconsin residents receive publicly funded alcohol treatment
- Over 44,000 OWIs and PACs (prohibited alcohol content) violations in Wisconsin in 2006
- 6,000 alcohol-related driving injuries in Wisconsin in 2005
- 369 alcohol-related driving fatalities in Wisconsin in 2005
- Alcohol is related to the crimes of about half of Wisconsin’s 22,000 prisoners
- 70% of our 22,000 prisoners require alcohol or substance abuse treatment
Who pays the beer tax?
The beer tax is paid by:
- Wisconsin breweries on all sales made in Wisconsin.
- The Wisconsin wholesaler who imports beer into Wisconsin from a foreign country.
- The out-of-state shipper who ships beer into Wisconsin from other states.
Is any beer exempt from the beer tax?
No Wisconsin beer tax is due on the following:
- Beer furnished by a brewer to employees without charge on brewery premises.
- Beer which contains less than 0.5% alcohol by volume.
- Beer shipped to other states or foreign countries.
- Beer sold to industrial permittees for use in food items.
How much does it cost?
- The $9.7 million raised by the state beer tax last year covered only a fraction of treatment costs
- That doesn’t even include the $825 million in annual alcohol-related heath care costs that get passed along to Wisconsin taxpayers
- It doesn’t count the estimated $2.7 billion in state:
- Policing and court costs
- Incarceration costs
- Traffic crash costs
- Lost productivity costs
- Academic failure costs
- Premature death costs
- Each Wisconsin resident pays only $1.82 a year in beer taxes
- But also $18.64 in alcohol treatment costs
- … and $154 in alcohol-related healthcare costs
- … and $500 in alcohol-related criminal justice and societal costs
- Alcohol abuse and addiction cost the nation an estimated $220 billion in 2005
- …more than cancer ($196 billion)
- …and more than obesity ($133 billion)